• Users Online: 156
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 28-32

Detection of intestinal protozoa by using different methods


1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Technology and Engineering, Sebha University, Barack, Libya
2 Department of Dermatology, Era's Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, India
3 Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
4 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Sebha University, Barack, Libya

Date of Web Publication21-Oct-2014

Correspondence Address:
Abdul Hafeez Khan
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Sebha University, Sebha
Libya
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2348-1471.143326

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

A total of 305 stools samples during the period of October 2011 to June 2012 were collected from patients attending Brack General Hospital and Medical Technology, Department of Brack, Al-Shati, Libya. All stool samples were examined by direct smear preparation in normal saline, iodine, and eosin stains and 4 concentration methods (formalin-ether, normal saline sedimentation, zinc sulfate, and Sheather's sugar flotation). Of the 305 samples, 18.03% stools were found positive for protozoan parasites in direct smear microscopy. Normal saline sedimentation and zinc sulfate flotation detected 27.21% and 23.6% positive samples, respectively. However, formalin-ether was found to be the most sensitive method. Sheather's sugar flotation failed to detect Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Entamoeba coli, and Blastocystis hominis. B. hominis was the most common parasite among the patients. Concentration techniques showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) detection rates of parasites compared with direct smear microscopy.

Keywords: Formalin-ether, intestinal protozoa, sheather′s sugar


How to cite this article:
Mergani MH, Mohammed MA, Khan N, Bano M, Khan AH. Detection of intestinal protozoa by using different methods. Dent Med Res 2014;2:28-32

How to cite this URL:
Mergani MH, Mohammed MA, Khan N, Bano M, Khan AH. Detection of intestinal protozoa by using different methods. Dent Med Res [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 18];2:28-32. Available from: http://www.dmrjournal.org/text.asp?2014/2/2/28/143326


  Introduction Top


Generally, the prevalence rate of gastrointestinal parasites varies from one area to another depending on the degree of personal and community hygiene, sanitation, and climatic factors [1],[2] and different diagnostic techniques may also influence their detection. [3] Young children and adolescents in developing countries display highest prevalence of intestinal parasites and burden of morbidity. Intestinal parasites are linked to diarrhea, dysentery, weight loss, malnutrition, anemia, abdominal pain, and other gastrointestinal ailments. [4] Also chronic parasitism impairs physical development and cognitive functions of growing children. [5] Gastrointestinal parasites can cause infection in both humans and animals. Some of these are potentially zoonotic. [6],[7] Moreover, intestinal opportunistic parasitic infections are also a serious public health problem, which has been increasing in recent years in developing countries. [8],[9]

Relatively, little work has been done on the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in Libya. [10],[11],[12],[13],[14] and complete information of intestinal parasites is lacking. The most common intestinal parasites in Libya are Blastocystic hominis followed by Entamoeba histolyitca/dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba coli.[11],[15],[16] Moreover, Cryptosporidium spp. infections have been reported in Libya among patients, particularly in children with diarrhea. [14],[17],[18],[19] Relatively, low infection rates of helminthes have also been reported in this country. [11],[14]

The diagnosis of intestinal parasites is performed by microscopic examination of stools, which has been recognized as the "gold standard" for a long time. [20] Stool examination is regularly used for parasitological diagnosis; however, this system of diagnosis has some limitations, such as lack of sensitivity, especially when the diagnosis relies on a single microscopic examination of stool specimens. [21] This is probably due to irregular or intermittent shedding of parasites or the low numbers of their excretion in feces. The most commonly used methods for detecting intestinal parasites from stool examination include direct smear microscopy and concentration techniques. [22] However, recent reports have indicated that concentration techniques showed variable efficiency in the detection of intestinal parasites in stools. [22],[23],[24] Therefore, multiple stool examinations or more than one copro-parasitological method should be used for diagnosis of intestinal parasites, which are usually undetected or at least unrecognized during routine direct smear microscopy in laboratories. So far, different parasitological methods have not been evaluated in Libya for detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples. Thus, studies are required for evaluation of different parasitological methods for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in Libya to find out whether these methods would increase the detection capacity of parasites in stools or any variations if present. Therefore, the aim of present study was to compare direct smear microscopy and 4 concentration methods: Normal saline sedimentation, formalin-ether sedimentation, zinc sulfate flotation, and Sheather's sugar flotation technique for the detection of intestinal protozoa in clinical stool specimens.


  Materials and Methods Top


This cross-sectional study was conducted during the period of October 2011 to July 2012. A total of 305 stool samples were collected from patients attending Brack Hospital and Medical Technology Laboratory, Brack for the detection of intestinal parasitic infection. Out of 305, 107 were males and 198 were females. All patients who were able to provide stool samples during their visits were included in the study. Necessary permissions to conduct this study were obtained from the authorities of Brack Hospital and Department of Medical Technology Laboratory, Brack before commencement of the study. Each sample was processed and examined immediately after collection, by routine direct fecal smear microscopy and concentration techniques using normal saline and Lugol's iodine preparations to record the prevalence of intestinal parasites in patients. Direct wet mount was used primarily to detect motile forms of protozoa, allowing study of the motility of the organisms, which are often characteristic. Formalin-ether sedimentation concentration technique was used for the concentration of intestinal parasites as described by Cook, and Chessbrough. [25],[26] Simple normal saline sedimentation technique was carried out. [27]

Concentration of stool specimens was accomplished by zinc sulfate floatation method [28] to demonstrate cysts and eggs of intestinal parasites. Sheather's sugar floatation, sugar flotation method was used for concentration of intestinal parasites in the stools, as described by Anderson. [29] Modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) acid-fast stain was used to identify the oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. in the fecal specimens following the procedures described by Garcia et al.,[30] and Baxby et al.[31]

Statistical analysis and chi square test were carried out by using SPSS version 16. A probability (P) value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant whenever appropriate.


  Results Top


Routinely submitted 305 stool samples were examined by the direct smear microscopy (in normal saline, iodine, and eosin stains) and 4 concentration techniques (sedimentation of parasites in formalin-ether and normal saline, and flotation in zinc sulfate, and Sheather's sugar) for detection intestinal parasites. Results are presented in [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 1: Detection of intestinal parasites using direct smear microscopy and concentration methods


Click here to view
Table 2: Detection of protozoan parasites with concentration methods


Click here to view


High detection rate of parasites was observed by formalin-ether 89 (29.18%), normal saline sedimentation 83 (23.21%), and zinc sulfate 72 (23.60%) followed by direct smear preparations 55 (18.03%) in normal saline, iodine, and eosin stains. Concentration techniques were more efficient (P < 0.05) in detecting parasites compared with direct smear microscopy. There was no significant difference between formalin-ether, normal saline sedimentation and zinc sulfate floatation techniques in the detection of intestinal protozoa. Sheather's sugar method flotation detected significantly low (P < 0.05) positivity rate 11 (3.60%). There was no statistical difference between formalin-ether, normal saline sedimentation, and zinc sulfate floatation techniques for the detection of intestinal protozoa.

B. hominis was the most common parasite among the patients. Sixty-three (20.65%) samples were positive upon use of concentration methods along with direct smear microscopy, while 51 (16.72%) showed positive detection when direct smear microscopy alone was used. About 9.50%, 0.65%, and 1.31% of the samples were found to be positive for E. histolytica/dispar, E. coli, and G. lamblia, respectively."

Formalin-ether sedimentation showed highest percentage of positive samples, and Sheather's sugar flotation gave least positive rates of parasites in stool specimens. The later method could not detect E. histolytica/dispar, E. coli, and B. hominis in stool specimen of patients but detected G. lamblia (1.31%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (2.29%).

None of 305 stool specimens was found positive for helminthes eggs or larvae. Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected only in 4 and 7 stool specimens by formalin-ether sedimentation and Sheather's sugar flotation procedures, respectively. Single parasitic infections had a higher prevalence (96.60%) compared to multiple infections (3.37%) protozoa among patients.


  Discussion Top


In Libya, diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections in clinical laboratories is made by routine direct smear microscopy of stools in normal saline or iodine preparations. Evaluation of different concentration procedures has not been done for clinical specimens. Therefore, data are not available for comparison. The present study describes comparison of 4 concentration techniques for the detection of parasites in stools and makes data available for comparison.

The results of this study demonstrates the value of using both sedimentation and flotation procedures. Formalin-ether sedimentation confirmed an increase of detection efficiency of parasites in stools compared to other concentration methods used in the study. This observation agrees favorably with other similar studies, [22],[32],[33],[34] which reported superiority of formalin-ether over other concentration procedures.

The results of this study revealed the distinctive superiority of concentration techniques over direct smear microscopy (P < 0.05). This result agrees with other studies, [14],[22],[35],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38] which clearly indicated that formalin-ether sedimentations are advantageous over direct smear preparations.

In the present study, results obtained with sedimentation procedures (formalin-ether and normal saline) and flotation methods (zinc sulfate) were almost similar for the detection of protozoa cysts (E. histolytica/dispar, E. coli, G. lamblia, and B. hominis). Similar findings have been observed by Truant et al.,[39] who reported no significant difference between sedimentation (formalin-ether and formalin-ethyl acetate) and flotation (zinc sulfate) procedures for the identification of protozoan cysts. However, Bartlett et al.[40] and Truant et al., [39] reported that compared to zinc sulfate method, formalin-ether method missed detection of some protozoan cysts. Moreover, Methanitikorn et al.,[41] also reported that formalin-ether sedimentation detected a higher percentage of positive samples of protozoa than formalin-Tween concentration technique. However, Bartlett et al., [40] and Truant et al.,[39] also observed that compared to zinc sulfate method, formalin-ether method missed detection of some protozoan cysts. Sheather's sugar flotation method in the present study, detected significantly lower percentage of positive samples. This could be due to disintegration of certain parasites in Sheather's sugar solution as its specific gravity is high. This result agrees with similar observation reported by Scott et al.,[36] who observed that many parasites were detected by formalin-ether method but were not seen in Sheather's sugar flotation of parasites in stool specimens.

This study also demonstrated that among patients in Wadi Al-Shati Province, there is 29.18% incidence of intestinal protozoa. This finding is within the range of prevalence rate reported from other cities of Libya. [11],[14] However, results differ from El-Buni and Khan, [42] Sadaqa and Kassem, [12] and Ben-Mousa, [13] who reported lower prevalence rates of intestinal parasites among Libyan population.

In the present study, B. hominis was the most common parasite reported in the stool specimens of patients. Similarly, studies from other regions of Libya [11],[12],[14],[15],[43] have reported a prevalence rate of B. hominis range between 18.5% and 29.5%. With particular attention to B. hominis, sedimentation (formalin-ether and normal saline) and flotation (zinc sulfate) techniques were more effective in detecting of this organism. A similar result was reported by Truant et al.,[39] who found that formalin-ether was suitable for the detection of B. hominis.

In Libya, limited studies have been carried out for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis. [17],[18],[19],[44] These studies reported an incidence of cryptosporidiosis varies from 3.19% to 13.0%. Regarding cryptosporidial infection in the present study, 305 stool specimens were concentrated for parasites by using formalin-ether sedimentation and Sheather's sugar flotation methods for the detection of oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. Only 4 (1.31%) and 7 (3.60%) samples were found positive for Cryptosporidium spp. by formalin-ether and Sheather's sugar flotation techniques, respectively. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between two methods in detecting overall infection of this organism. Almost similar incidence of cryptosporidiosis (2.51%) has been reported by Gelani et al., [14] among random population of Wadi Al-Shati Province. Scott et al., [36] compared formalin-ether and Sheather's sugar flotation procedures for the detection of oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. and found that Sheather's sugar flotation method detected slightly more number of positive samples compared to formalin-ether method. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

In the present study, direct smear microscopy missed the detection of parasites in stool specimens. Both formalin-ether and normal saline sedimentation techniques appear to be suitable and emphasized to achieve the maximum detection of parasites in clinical stool samples. However, zinc sulfate has advantage. Wet mounts prepared from the surface films have less background fecal detritus than formalin-ether or normal saline sedimentation wet mounts. This would be helpful for individuals with limited experience in microscopic screening.


  Conclusion Top


This study shows that the prevalence of intestinal protozoan parasites is relatively high in the studied population. This study also indicated that formalin-ether procedure provides a suitable alternative to normal sedimentation and zinc sulfate flotation method. Formalin-ether method is recommended as a single concentration method for the routine examination of the intestinal parasites in clinical stool samples.

 
  References Top

1.Hostetter MK, Iverson S, Thomas W, Mckenzil D, Dole K, Johnson DE. Medical evaluation of internationally adopted children. N Engl J Med 1991;325:479-85.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Miller K, Duran C, Lopez A, Morales L, Morales-Lechuga L, Taren D, et al. Cryptosporidium parrum in children with diarrhea in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995;51:322-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Roberts T, Barratt J, Harkners J, Ellis J, Stark D. Comparison of microscopy, culture and conventional polymerase chain reaction for detection of Blastocystis sp. in clinical stool samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011;84:308-12.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Berkman DS, Lescano A, Gilman RH, Black MM. Effects of stunning, diarrheal disease and parasitic infection during infancy and on cognition in late childhood: A follow-up study. Lancet 2002;359:564-71.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Nematian J, Cholamrezanezhad A, Nematian E. Giardians and other intestinal parasitic infections in relation to anthropometric indicators of malnutrition: A large, population-based survey of school. 2008.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Majewska AC, Werner A, Sulima P, Luty T. Survey of equine cryptosporidiasis in Poland and the possibility of zoonotic transmission. Ann Agric Environ Med 1999;6:161-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Marques FR, Cardoso LV, Cavasini CE, Almeida MC, Bassi NA, Almeida MT, et al. Performance of an immunoenzymatic assay for Cryptosporidium diagnosis of fecal samples. Braz J Infect Dis 2005;9:3-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Kumar SS, Anathan S, Saravanan P. Role of coccidian parasites in causation of diarrhea in HIV infected patients in Chennai. Indian J Med Res 2002;116:85-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Quihui L, Morales GG, Mendez RO, Leyva JG, Romero JE, Valencia ME. Could guardians be a risk factor for low zinc status in school children from northwestern Mexico? A cross sectional study with longitudinal follow-up. BMC Public Health 2010;10:85.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Dar FK, El-Kouly SI, Hoda A, El-Boulaqi, Munir R, El-Maghrebi S. Intestinal parasites in Benghazi school children. Garyounis Med J 1979;2:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Al-Fellani MA, Abdulrahman OM, Khan AH, Abousaif AA. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in Sebha, Libya. Garyounis Med J 2005;22:56-60.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Sadaga GA, Kassem HH. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among primary school children in Derna District, Libya. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2007;37:205-14.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Ben Mousa NA. Intestinal parasites in school aged children and the first case report on amoebians in urinary bladder in Tripoli, Libya. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2007;37:755-84.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Gelani SS, Abdulhafeez K, Abdul Qader A, Awatif MA, Mohammed Al-Shebani Yosef K. A study of prevalence of human intestinal parasites in Wadi Al-Shati region. Sebha Med J 2009;2:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Saleh MM. Prevalence of human intestinal parasites in Sebha City. M.Sc. Thesis, Sebha university, Sebha, Libya. 2007.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Awatif M, Khan AH, Abdul Qader A, Gelani S, Mohammed S, Daew A. Prevalence of Blastocystishominis in Wadi -Al-Shati Province. Sebha Med J 2008;7:4-10.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Bugharara SI, Ali YM, Khan AH, Nadia IE. Incidence of Cryptosporidium in patients with diarrhea. Riv Di Parassit 1999;16:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Ali MB, Ghenghesh KS, Aissa RB, Abohelfaia A, Dufani M. Etiology of childhood diarrhea in Zlieten, Libya. Saudi Med J 2005;26:1759-65.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Kara WM, El-Heggiagi MB, Shaban AO. Cryptosporidasis among children in Tripoli. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2006;36:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Koontz F, Weinstock JV. The approach to stool examination of parasites. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996;25:435-49.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Rocha MO, Mello RT, Guimaraes TM, Toledo Vd, Moreira Md, Costa CA. Detection of Giardia lamblia coproantigen by using a commercially available immunoenzymatic assay, in belo horizonte, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 1999;41:151-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Moges F, Belyhun Y, Triureh M, Kebede Y, Mulu A, Kassu A, et al. Comparison of formal-acetate concentration method with that of direct iodine preparation and formal-ether concentration methods for examination of stool parasites. Ethiop J Health Dev 2010;24:148-51.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Hong ST, Choi MH, Kim CH, Chung BS, Ji Z. The Kato-Katz method is reliable of diagnosis of Clonorchis sinensis infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;47:345-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Utzinger JN, Goran E, Marti K. Intestinal amoebiasis, Giardia lambila and geohelminthiasis: Their association with other intestinal parasites and reported intestinal symptoms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999;92:137-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Cook G. Manson's Tropical Diseases. 20 th ed. W.B. Saunders; 1996. p. 1738-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Chessbrough M. District laboratory practice in Tropical countries. 2 nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p.191-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Rugaya MA. A Study of Blastocystishominis by direct smear and culture method in Sebha. M.Sc. Thesis, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya. 2006.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Aish LR, Orihel TC. Parasite: Acquire to laboratory procedures and identification. Vol. 23. Chicago: American Society of clinical pathologist's press ;1987.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Anderson BC. Experimental infection in mice of Cryptosporidium muris isolated from camel. J Protozool 1991;38:16-7S.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Garcia LS, Bruckner DA, Brewer TC, Shamizu RY. Techniques for the recovery and identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts for stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:185-90.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Baxby D, Blundell N, Hart CA. The development and performance of simple, sensitive method for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faeces. J Hyg (Lond) 1984;92:317-23.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Parija SC, Bhathacharya S, Padhan P, Shivaprakash MR. Evaluation of formalin-acetone sedimentation in the concentration of stool for intestinal parasites. J Trop Doct 2003;33:163-4.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Garcia LS. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. Washington: ASM Press; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Zaglool DA, Khodari YA, Othman RA, Farooq MU. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and bacteria among food handlers in a tertiary care hospital. Niger Med J 2011;52:266-70.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
35.Young KH, Bullock SL, Melvin DM, Spruill CL. Ethyl acetate as a substitute for diethyl ether in the formalin-ether sedimentation technique. J Clin Microbiol 1979;10:852-3.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]    
36.McNabb SJ, Hensel DM, Welch DF, Heijbel H, McKee GL, Istre GR. Comparison of sedimentation and flotation techniques for identification of Cryptosporidium cysts in a large outbreak of human diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:587-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
[PUBMED]    
37.Uga S, Tanaka K, Iwamoto N. Evaluation and modification of the formalin-ether sedimentation techniques. Trop Biomed 2010;27:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Kheriandish F, Tarah M, Haghighi A, Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E, Kheriandish M. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in bakery workers in Khorramabad, lorestan Iran. Iran J Parasitol 2011;6:76-83.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Truant AL, Elliott SH, Kelly MT, Smith JH. Comparison of formalin-ethyle ether sedimentation, formalin-ether acetate sedimentation, and zinc sulphateflotion techniques for detection of intestinal parasites. J Clin Microbiol 1981;13:882-4.  Back to cited text no. 39
[PUBMED]    
40.Bartlett MS, Harper K, Smith N, Verbanac P, Smith JW. Comparative evaluation of a modified zinc-sulphate flotation technique. J Clin Microbiol 1978;7:524-8.  Back to cited text no. 40
[PUBMED]    
41.Methanitikorn R, Sukontason K, Sukontason KL, Piangjai S. Evaluation of formalin-tween concentration technique for parasitic detection. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 2003;45:289-91.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.El-Buni AA, Khan AH. Intestinal protozoan infections in Benghzi. Sebha Med J 1988;1:106-8.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Khan AH, Mohammed AA, Rugaiya MA, Abudlrahman OM. A comparison of direct smear microscopy, concentration and culture method for the diagnosis of Blastocystishominis. Jamahiriya Med J 2008;8:31-4.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Al-Tawaty AH, Khan AH, Naida IE, El-Buni AA. Screening of Cryptosporidiumoocysts in clinically immunocompetent children. Garyounis Med J 2002;19:26-33.  Back to cited text no. 44
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Africa: current and future challenges
Sylvia Afriyie Squire,Una Ryan
Parasites & Vectors. 2017; 10(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Prevalence ofEntamoeba histolytica,Giardia lamblia, andCryptosporidiumspp. in Libya: 20002015
Khalifa Sifaw Ghenghesh,Khaled Ghanghish,Elloulu T. BenDarif,Khaled Shembesh,Ezzadin Franka
Libyan Journal of Medicine. 2016; 11(0)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4005    
    Printed54    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded338    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]