• Users Online: 177
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 29-30

The lowest epistemologic strength and the highest citation rate: An opinion

Independent Research Scientist, Founder and Managing Editor of Dental Hypotheses, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
Jafar Kolahi
No. 24, Faree 15, Pardis, Shahin Shahr, Isfahan - 83179-18981
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2348-1471.171924

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kolahi J. The lowest epistemologic strength and the highest citation rate: An opinion. Dent Med Res 2016;4:29-30

How to cite this URL:
Kolahi J. The lowest epistemologic strength and the highest citation rate: An opinion. Dent Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 31];4:29-30. Available from: https://www.dmrjournal.org/text.asp?2016/4/1/29/171924


I recently read an interesting article "The 100 most cited articles in dentistry." [1] In this study, source of data was journal citation report 2010 published by the web of science in the category of "Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine." The number of citations of the top 100 articles diverse from 326 to 2050. They are from 21 journals of the 77 journals indexed in web of science. The journals with the major number of the most cited articles were the Journal of Clinical Periodontology (20 articles), the Journal of Periodontology (18 articles), and the Journal of Dental Research (16 articles). Majority of the most cited dental articles were clinical studies (66%) and the remaining were related to topics of basic research. Most of these articles were published in the 1980s and 1990s.

However, I was surprised reading the result of the investigation. Nowadays, it is widely believed that evidence-based medicine/dentistry is the most reliable approach in clinical practice and research. Evidence-based approach classifies evidence by its epistemological strength. [Figure 1] summarizes the hierarchy of evidence in the evidence-based approach. Clearly, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials can yield the strongest recommendations. The unacceptable point is that among 100 most cited dental articles only 2% were meta-analysis and systematic reviews and 2% were randomized controlled trials. It means that dental research scientist pays the lowest attention to the most valuable evidence. On the other hand, case series (23%) and narrative review/expert opinions (19%) are the most common type of articles among 100 most cited dental articles.
Figure 1: Hierarchy of evidence in an evidence-based approach

Click here to view

Why articles with the lowest epistemological strength had the highest citation rate? is the question. Answering this question would be very difficult. Most common area of research among 100 most cited dental articles are periodontology (43%) and implantology (11%). Conduction of clinical trials in these fields may be difficult. However, it is not a reason to pay more attention to case series and narrative reviews/expert opinions.

Other sources of bias would be: Self-citation, language bias, preference of authors to the cite articles from the journal in which they plan to publish their own articles, trend to cite articles from influential researchers, colleagues and reviewers, and tendency of some researchers to cite certain articles only because they have earlier received numerous of citations rather than their quality. [1]

Nevertheless, this lack of correlation between hierarchy of evidence and number of citations in the field of dental science is not acceptable. Researchers, journal editors, and reviewers must pay more attention to the principles of evidence-based dentistry.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:699-706.  Back to cited text no. 1


  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014
J. Kolahi,S. Khazaei
BDJ. 2016; 220(11): 569
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded299    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal